top of page

Plagiarism in Photography

The Unseen Lines: Ethical Boundaries in Photography


In the realm of photography, where the world is a shared canvas and perspectives are as numerous as the stars, the distinction between homage and theft is delicate and often contentious. This discourse is not a legal treatise but rather a contemplation on the ethical dimensions of originality in our craft, ignited by an incident that casts a spotlight on the often invisible lines we navigate as creators.






Defining Plagiarism in Photography


Plagiarism, in its broadest sense, refers to the act of taking another creator's work, idea, or expression and presenting it as one's own. In the context of photography, this can take many forms: from replicating the composition and settings of a well-known photograph to re-creating a unique concept without acknowledgment. It breaches not just a moral code but also the sanctity of individual expression that photography, as an art form, holds dear.


Examples of Plagiarism in Photography


1. Replication of a Unique Composition:

If Photographer A has crafted an iconic image characterized by a distinctive composition—say, a unique framing of a landmark through a patterned foreground—and Photographer B later replicates this exact composition and presents it as their own, it can be seen as plagiarism.


2. Copying a Conceptual Series:

Imagine Photographer A develops a concept where they photograph the shadows of objects in urban spaces, creating a narrative about the unseen life of a city. Photographer B sees this series and decides to create a series of shadow-focused images in urban environments without any change in concept or acknowledgement, this could be considered plagiarism.


3. Imitation of a Distinctive Technique:

Photographer A is known for a special technique that involves using long exposures to create ghostly images of people moving through museums. If Photographer B uses this same technique in museums and markets the photographs without crediting the original artist or adding any significant original input, it might be viewed as plagiarism.



The Complexities of Visual Appropriation: 


Photography plagiarism isn't always straightforward. Unlike words on a page, a photograph is a complex interplay of subject, composition, light, and moment. Two photographers might stand at the same point, yet where one leaves with an image borne of their own vision and perspective, another might consciously mimic the settings and style of a known piece, diluting the original's distinct voice. This act, when devoid of transformative addition or due credit, veers into the murky waters of visual plagiarism.


Plagiarism in Photography: Legal vs. Ethical Considerations: 

While plagiarism in photography might not always be illegal under copyright law, it raises significant ethical questions about artistic integrity and creative ownership. Legal frameworks primarily protect specific expressions of creative work, such as photographs, but do not always capture the broader ethical implications of plagiarism.


Ethical Implications of Plagiarism: 

At its core, photography is not just about capturing images but also about storytelling, personal expression, and the unique perspective of the photographer. Plagiarism undermines these principles by eroding trust within the creative community, diminishing the value of original contributions, and perpetuating a culture of unacknowledged appropriation.



Personal Anecdote: 

My journey with the Banksy Tunnel in London's Leake Street began in 2018...


The Essence of Originality: 

My journey with the Banksy Tunnel in London's Leake Street began in 2018. Since then, I have returned annually to document the ephemeral art gracing its walls. This series isn't just about capturing graffiti; it’s about recording time, change, and the evolving dialogue between street artists and their environment.


The Case of the Replicated Image: 

Recently, a follower, someone I once inspired, captured an image strikingly similar to mine — same spot, same composition, same concept. Their image then surfaced without any acknowledgement of the influence or roots of its inspiration.


Defining Plagiarism in Photography:

Plagiarism, as commonly understood, refers to the act of taking someone else's creation and passing it off as one's own. In photography, it isn't the subject but the expression, the distinctive composition, and the photographer's unique interaction with the scene that breathes life into a photo. But what happens when someone reproduces your unique interaction without credit?


Examples of Plagiarism in Photography:
  1. Direct Copying: A photographer visits Leake Street, positions their camera at the exact angle I have used for my annual series capturing the evolving graffiti, and publishes the image without acknowledging the series that pioneered this viewpoint.

  2. Concept Appropriation: After my Banksy Tunnel series gains recognition, another artist begins a similar project with the same concept and execution—documenting a specific urban art space over time—without crediting the original idea.

  3. Imitation of Style: A fellow photographer adopts not only the unique composition I created for a photo series but also imitates the post-processing style that gives my images their signature look, thereby mirroring the aesthetic and feel of my work.


Grey Areas and Discontent: 

While it's clear that no one owns the viewpoint of a public place, the replication of a photograph that carries a distinctive series of attributes raises questions. Where do we draw the line, and how does the community view the near-identical recreation of a concept that an artist has been associated with over time?


Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: 

The situation opens a discussion about the ethical responsibility we carry as photographers to honour and credit the source of our inspiration, especially when it directly influences our work. It's a conversation about respect — for the art, for the original artist, and for the unwritten rules that govern our creative community.


A Personal Standpoint: 

As a respected artist and educator, I believe in fostering an environment where creative expression flourishes yet remains authentic and respectful. It's essential to guide emerging artists on these principles, ensuring that the art we create and admire retains its integrity.


Understanding and navigating the nuanced landscape of inspiration and plagiarism is a challenge that every photographer must face. Through this personal account, my aim is to illuminate the often-overlooked ethical line that we, as artists, should navigate with care, in pursuit of not only our creative endeavours but also the respect for those who walk with us in this artistic journey.


References:

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 in the UK


153 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page